Hi Arnd, I know you're travelling, but... On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:41:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > When XIP_KERNEL is enabled, some functions are defined in the .data > ELF section because we require them to be in RAM whenever we communicate > with the flash chip. However this causes problems when FTRACE is > enabled and gcc emits calls to __gnu_mcount_nc in the function > prolog: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_chip_setup': > :(.data+0x272fc): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_probe_chip': > :(.data+0x27de8): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccY172rP.s:70: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_probe.o] Error 1 > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s:421: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.o] Error 1 > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s:1895: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors Can you provide a sample .config that DOES build correctly with XIP_KERNEL enabled + this patch? My first attempt yields some other failures I don't care to fixup right now... Anyway, I don't doubt you have a good fix here, so I can probably take it. Any review from others would be welcome though. > Specifically, this does not work because the .data section is not > marked executable, which leads LD to not generate trampolines for > long calls. > > This moves the __xipram functions into their own .xiptext section instead. > The section is still placed next to .data and located in RAM but is marked > executable, which avoids the build errors. > > Also, we only need to place the XIP functions into a separate section > if both CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL and CONFIG_MTD_XIP are set: When only MTD_XIP > is used, the whole kernel is still in RAM and we do not need to worry > about pulling out the rug under it. When only XIP_KERNEL but not MTD_XIP > is set, the kernel is in some form of ROM, but we never write to it. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html