On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Two threads:
>
> int a, b;
>
> void thread0(void)
> {
> WRITE_ONCE(a, 1);
> smp_wmb();
> WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
> }
>
> void thread1(void)
> {
> WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
> smp_wmb();
> WRITE_ONCE(a, 2);
> }
>
> /* After all threads have completed and the dust has settled... */
>
> BUG_ON(a == 1 && b == 1);
So the more I look at that kind of litmus test, the less I think that
we should care, because I can't come up with a scenario in where that
kind of test makes sense. without even a possibility of any causal
relationship between the two, I can't say why we'd ever care about the
ordering of the (independent) writes to the individual variables.
If somebody can make up a causal chain, things differ. But as long as
all the CPU's are just doing locally ordered writes, I don't think we
need to care about a global store ordering.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
