On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 09:35:59AM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> We do not have enough bits left to cover any potential future use-cases
> with other strings if we are going to get rid of strcmp() completely.
Look at the examples I gave. I'm talking about having an additional
identifier which can be a number and not a bit.
> Since the searches from crash and kexec are one-time thing, and einj
> is a R&D tool, I think we can leave the strcmp() check for these
> special cases, and keep the interface flexible with any strings.
I don't think using strings is anywhere close to flexible. If at all, it
is an odd use case which shouldnt've been allowed in in the first place.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
