On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 > disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to > reference the individual function entry points that are provided by > kernel/sys_ni.c in this case, and the declarations are hidden inside > of #ifdef CONFIG_UID16: Will we ever get rid of UID16? kernel/uid.c contains this nice comment: /* * Wrapper functions for 16bit uid back compatibility. All nicely tied * together in the faint hope we can take the out in five years time. */ Which seems to exist since at least February 2000. ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
