On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 01:35:36AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 04.11.2015 um 15:15 schrieb Octavian Purdila:
> > We could redefine the syscalls/libc symbols to call lkl_sys_ functions
> > in launch-lkl, e.g.:
> >
> > int opendir(const char *path)
> > {
> > return lkl_opendir(new_path)
> > }
>
> To get a better feeling how LKL behaves I've started with a tool
> to mount any Linux filesystem by FUSE.
> I.e. such that we can finally automount without root and bugs in filesystem
> code won't hurt that much.
guestmount already does this:
http://libguestfs.org/guestmount.1.html
By porting a small amount of code from the daemon/ directory, it could
do it using lkl too. See:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2296116#2296116
Rich.
> lkl_sys_fstatat64() uses the type struct lkl_stat64. Where is it defined?
> git grep is unable to locate it.
> At least it seems to be incompatible with my local struct stat.
>
> And why is there no lkl_sys_openat() syscall?
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
