On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:36:52PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:36:51 +0900 > > > For the convenience for Dave, I found this. > > > > commit ec98c6b9b47df6df1c1fa6cf3d427414f8c2cf16 > > Author: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Sun Apr 20 02:14:23 2008 -0700 > > > > [SPARC]: Remove SunOS and Solaris binary support. > > > > As per Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hello Dave, > > Could you confirm it? > > I don't understand what you want me to confirm. Sorry for lacking of the information. Is it okay to use number 8 for upcoming madvise(addr, len, MADV_FREE) feature in sparc arch? The reason to ask is that Darrick pointed out earlier that dietlibc has a Solaris #define MADV_FREE 0x5 in its mman.h and Hugh pointed out that was in the kernel's sparc mman.h up until 2.6.25 but disappeared now so I guess it's okay to use the number 8 for MADV_FREE in sparc but want to confirm from you. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
