On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 22:45 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Then I would argue for naming this differently. Make it an optional > > hint "DMA_ATTR_HIGH_PERF" or something like that. Whether this is > > achieved via using a bypass or other means in the backend not the > > business of the driver. > > > > With a name like that, who wouldn't pass that flag? ;-) xHCI for example, vs. something like 10G ethernet... but yes I agree it sucks. I don't like that sort of policy anywhere in drivers. On the other hand the platform doesn't have much information to make that sort of decision either. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
