Re: [PATCH v2] barriers: introduce smp_mb__release_acquire and update documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:40:39AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> 
> >  - RELEASE -> ACQUIRE _chains_ (on shared variables) preserve causality,
> >    (because each link is fully ordered) but are not transitive.
> 
> Yup, and that's the same for UNLOCK -> LOCK, too.

Agreed, except RELEASE/ACQUIRE is more RCpc than UNLOCK/LOCK.

IFF we can get UNLOCK/LOCK as RCsc the chains are strongly transitive,
unlike the RELEASE/ACQUIRE chains, which will be weakly so.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux