On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I don't think we really need to spell it out here. s390 PCI is different >>> from everybody else's in a lot of ways, so a simple 'depends on PCI && >>> !S390' for CONFIG_PCI_IOMAP seems simpler and more intuitive. >> >> Sure that would work as well. > > But on second thought it still would leave us reactive to S390, this > solution would get folks extending this asm-generic stuff to also have > something in place for S390, even if its just returning NULL. Arnd, thoughts? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
