On Monday 27 July 2015 01:08 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> >> Per last discussion on this topic, Arend wanted to discuss abt this with Hante. >>> >> I'm not taking it anyways so feel free to pick it up if you want ! >> > >> > Well, that was before your "timeline" clarification about the generic >> > function. One what tree is this patch based? > Yeah, if this patch depends on another patch I need to know about it. > Otherwise I might break something when I apply this patch. It was latest linux-next at the time, 4.1-rcx perhaps, don't remember exactly. But it certainly doesn't depend on any new code - the patch simply makes use of an existing API vs. using a local hard coded version of same. Give it a spin off your existing tree - shdn't be too difficult to test I presume. -Vineet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
