On Thursday 09 July 2015 11:55 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 07/09/2015 10:13 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> > There's already a generic implementation so use that instead. > There is or there was? If there is now I am fine with this patch, but if > it already was there the author might have had a reason for adding a > local function and I would like to hear that reason. > atomic_orr() was introduced to this driver with 2014-03-06 5cbb9c285bdc brcmfmac: Use atomic functions for intstatus update. as it seems atomic_set_mask() was not available cross arch. And atomic_or() in generic code was indeed introduced after that 2014-04-23 560cb12a4080 locking,arch: Rewrite generic atomic support Hence likely the reason author went with home grown atomic_orr() -Vineet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
