Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] x86: support kmap_atomic_pfn_t() for persistent memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The code is mostly generic, so the x86 in the subject is a little misleading.
What keeps the Kconfig symbol in x86 anyway?  Is there a reason why
it can't be made entirely generic?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux