On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:47:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - introduce the '..' denotion (in the final table) to show features
> that cannot be supported by an architecture due to hardware
> dependencies:
>
> gcov-profile-all:---------------.
> THP:--------. |
> irq-time-acct:-. | |
> | | |
> ----------------------------------------
> alpha | TODO | TODO | TODO |
> arc | TODO | .. | TODO |
> arm | ok | ok | ok |
> arm64 | TODO | ok | ok |
> avr32 | TODO | .. | TODO |
> blackfin | TODO | .. | TODO |
> c6x | TODO | .. | TODO |
>
> so in the 'THP' column, if an architecture could in theory support
> THP, it's listed as 'TODO', if it cannot, it's listed as '..'.
Shouldn't exactly that explanation be in the text file itself too?
Also, how about s/TODO//g for less clutter:
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ alpha | | | | | | | ok | ok | |
+ arc | ok | | | | | ok | ok | ok | |
+ arm | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | | ok | ok |
...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
