[PATCH v1 15/15] uaccess: decouple preemption from the pagefault logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As the fault handlers now all rely on the pagefault_disabled() checks
and implicit preempt_disable() calls by pagefault_disable() have been
made explicit, we can completely rely on the pagefault_disableD counter.

So let's no longer touch the preempt count when disabling/enabling
pagefaults. After a call to pagefault_disable(), pagefault_disabled()
will return true, but in_atomic() won't.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/uaccess.h | 16 ++--------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index 90786d2..ae572c1 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 #ifndef __LINUX_UACCESS_H__
 #define __LINUX_UACCESS_H__
 
-#include <linux/preempt.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
@@ -20,17 +19,11 @@ static __always_inline void pagefault_disabled_dec(void)
  * These routines enable/disable the pagefault handler. If disabled, it will
  * not take any locks and go straight to the fixup table.
  *
- * We increase the preempt and the pagefault count, to be able to distinguish
- * whether we run in simple atomic context or in a real pagefault_disable()
- * context.
- *
- * For now, after pagefault_disabled() has been called, we run in atomic
- * context. User access methods will not sleep.
- *
+ * User access methods will not sleep when called from a pagefault_disabled()
+ * environment.
  */
 static inline void pagefault_disable(void)
 {
-	preempt_count_inc();
 	pagefault_disabled_inc();
 	/*
 	 * make sure to have issued the store before a pagefault
@@ -47,11 +40,6 @@ static inline void pagefault_enable(void)
 	 */
 	barrier();
 	pagefault_disabled_dec();
-#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
-	preempt_count_dec();
-#else
-	preempt_enable();
-#endif
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux