On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:40:30PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > I think a separate counter just makes sense, as we are dealing with two > different concepts and we don't want to lose the preempt_disable =^ NOP > for !CONFIG_PREEMPT. Right, let me try and get my head on straight -- I'm so used to PREEMPT=y being the 'hard' case :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
