Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add lightweight memory barriers fast_rmb() and fast_wmb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/18/2014 01:57 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Alexander Duyck
These patches introduce two new primitives for synchronizing cache-enabled
memory writes and reads.  These two new primitives are:

	fast_rmb()
	fast_wmb()
Not sure I like the names.
If the aim is to sync data into the local cache so that hardware
that is doing cache-snooping accesses sees the data then maybe
	local_rmb() and local_wmb()

Yeah, that is the general consensus. I am planning to change them to coherent_rmb() and coherent_wmb().

IIRC read_barrier_depends() is a nop on everything except alpha.
Maybe add the default if it isn't defined by the MD file?

	David

From my patch the only two I saw define it were alpha and blackfin. It is already defined in asm-generic, the rest is just clean-up since I suspect some of the arch tree barrier.h calls just borrowed from asm-generic without sorting out what became redundancies.

Thanks,

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux