Re: [PATCH] all arches, signal: Move restart_block to struct task_struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:36:45AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> I never said it was the *only* juicy target, but we can fix the rest,
> too.  Also, I suspect that overwriting task could be harder to
> exploit.  First, you need to avoid crashing, and second, on systems
> with SMAP or similar protection, you need to make task point somewhere
> that contains a useful exploit payload.
> 
> We could probably get rid of thread_info's task pointer on x86, too --
> it's not used by get_current() any more.

Huh?  If you can overwrite that pointer, you can bloody well overwrite
->task itself, making it point into the overwritten part of stack right
next to thread_info.

Again, on most of the architectures the _only_ way to reach task_struct
is via thread_info:
	* everything that uses asm-generic/current.h - arm, arm64, blackfin,
c6x, hexagon, metag, mips, openrisc, sh, um, unicore32
	* everything that should be using it - alpha, avr32, cris, m32r,
parisc, score, tile.  These guys can simply add generic-y += current.h
into their asm/Kbuild and remove asm/current.h.
	* nearly the same situation - xtensa (there's an asm variant of
the same thing + copy of asm-generic/current.h for C)
	* sparc32
	* m68k-noMMU
	* mn10300-SMP

It's a strong majority.  Check arch/*/asm/current.h and see for yourself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux