Is the SH64 (sub)arch actually meant to be a 64-bit arch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Is the SH64 (sub)arch actually meant to be a 64-bit arch?
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:47:06 +0100
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx
List-id: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

Does anyone know if the SH64 arch is actually meant to be a 64-bit arch?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] Support for creating generic PCI host bridges from DT
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] PCI: OF: Parse and map the IRQ when adding the PCI device.
Previous by thread: [PATCH v4 0/8] asm-generic/io.h overhaul
Next by thread: [PATH V2 0/6] RCU get_user_pages_fast and __get_user_pages_fast
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Newbies] [x86 Platform Driver] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux Filesystems] [Yosemite Discussion] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux