The description of how archs should implement seccomp filters was still strictly correct, but it failed to describe the newly available optimizations. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig index 0eae9df..05d7a8a 100644 --- a/arch/Kconfig +++ b/arch/Kconfig @@ -323,6 +323,17 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER results in the system call being skipped immediately. - seccomp syscall wired up + For best performance, an arch should use seccomp_phase1 and + seccomp_phase2 directly. It should call seccomp_phase1 for all + syscalls if TIF_SECCOMP is set, but seccomp_phase1 does not + need to be called from a ptrace-safe context. It must then + call seccomp_phase2 if seccomp_phase1 returns anything other + than SECCOMP_PHASE1_OK or SECCOMP_PHASE1_SKIP. + + As an additional optimization, an arch may provide seccomp_data + directly to seccomp_phase1; this avoids multiple calls + to the syscall_xyz helpers for every syscall. + config SECCOMP_FILTER def_bool y depends on HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER && SECCOMP && NET -- 1.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
