On 07/14/14 02:10, Thierry Reding wrote:
> The reason behind this was that people have been told to migrate towards
> using io{read,write}{8,16,32}_rep() because {read,write}s{b,w,l}() are
> not as "portable". The only reason why the aren't portable is because no
> generic versions of them existed. That's what this series originally
> started out as.
>
> Also, it's somewhat backwards (and inconsistent) to go through the io*()
> functions when it's known up front that the device will always only be
> memory-mapped and never I/O mapped. So with these patches going forward,
> people should be using either {read,write}{,s}{b,w,l}() *or* their
> io{read,write}{8,16,32}{,_rep}() counterparts, not mixing them.
>
Thanks. Can we please have this explanation in the commit text?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
