Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +#define ATOMIC_OPS(op) ATOMIC_OP(op) ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op) Can ATOMIC_OP() just be an alias for ATOMIC_OP_RETURN() where that is appropriate? I suspect several arches (MN10300 included) are going to return the value *anyway*. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
