On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> and it
>> would be dumb as hell to have new archs use time_t 32bit when we are
>> currently twisting our brain around how to solve the y2038
>> problem. Simply because we can not do the BSD flag day approach and
>> change it.
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to have minor new architectures
> pointlessly different than the major ones. Especially given that we'll
> absolutely have to fir the y2038 problem for 32-bit arm and probably
> x86 anyway.
Considering someone just told me he plans to keep on using PPC
based MVME boards for 8 more years, you can expect some of today's
32-bit hardware to be around in 24 years...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
