Re: Dirty/Access bits vs. page content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The line numbers point to the
>
>         head = page_buffers(page);

Ahh. My tree has an ext4 update, so for me that wasn't the case, and
your line numbers were off.

Hmm. I've stared at it, and I can make neither heads nor tails of it.
I really don't see why moving the set_page_dirty() would matter for
that case. Very odd. I'll mull on it and maybe it comes to me
overnight.

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux