Re: Dirty/Access bits vs. page content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I just triggered it a second time.  It only happens with my debugging
> config[1] *and* those two fix patches.  It doesn't happen on the vanilla
> kernel with lost dirty bit.

Ok. So looking at it some more, I'm becoming more and more convinced
that we do need to make that set_page_dirty() call in
free_pages_and_swap_cache() be a set_page_dirty_lock() instead.

Does that make things work for you?

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux