Re: [PATCH v9 03/19] qspinlock: Add pending bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/18/2014 03:42 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>  wrote:

Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending
bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second
cacheline.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra<peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>
This patch should have a "From: Peter" in it as well, right?

Thanks,

	Ingo

Do you mean a "From:" line in the mail header? It will be a bit hard to have different "From:" header in the same patch series. I can certainly do that if there is an easy way to do it.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux