Re: [PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/17/2014 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:57AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
+#if !defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)&&  !defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
+#error "Missing either LITTLE_ENDIAN or BIG_ENDIAN definition."
+#endif
This seems entirely superfluous, I don't think a kernel build will go
anywhere if either is missing.

Yes, I am on the conservative side when I add that. I can certainly take it out if you think that is not needed.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux