Re: [PATCH 11/15] s390: NR_syscalls fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:25:47 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> index 5eb5c9ddb120..57194268fe63 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
>  #define __NR_finit_module	344
>  #define __NR_sched_setattr	345
>  #define __NR_sched_getattr	346
> -#define NR_syscalls 345
> +#define NR_syscalls 347
> 
>  /* 
>   * There are some system calls that are not present on 64 bit, some

Is this patch part of a patch series that does upstream directly?
I am asking because Heiko already created a patch for this and we have
added it to the linux-s390:fixes branch for upstream integration.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux