On 31 March 2014 11:59, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:24:04PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 28 March 2014 19:14, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thursday 27 March 2014, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> Switch the default unaligned access method to 'hardware implemented' >> >> if HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is set. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Is this part of a longer series of patches? If so, please keep >> > the patch with the others and merge it through an appropriate >> > tree. >> > >> >> No, not really. I ran into the alignment issue while working on the >> arm64 crypto stuff, but it is unclear when that will be going in. >> >> > If not, I guess I'll have to send it myself, but it will be >> > the only asm-generic patch for the merge window ;-) >> >> Perhaps Catalin is interested in taking it, as arm64 is the only arch >> that defines HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS /and/ uses the >> asm-generic version of unaligned.h. >> >> @Catalin? >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=139594237116121&w=2 > > I can take this, providing it doesn't break anything else. I'll push it > to -next but won't send it with the first arm64 pull request. > Are you still interested in taking this? Russell doesn't appear particularly unhappy with it, so I guess it should sit in -next for a bit before getting it merged. -- Ard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
