On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:22:43PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 31 March 2014 19:24, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > It actually affects arch/arm as well which selects > > HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS for v6/v7 and uses the generic > > unaligned.h > > > > Oops, my bad. I did a quick 'find -name unaligned.h' but misread 'arc' > for 'arm'. > > @Russell: ARM is a user of asm-generic/unaligned.h, and I proposed a > patch to asm-generic that switches to unaligned accesses if > HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is set by the arch. This should affect > a fair amount of code living under net/ and drivers/ that don't test > for the Kconfig symbol but expect get_unaligned_xx/put_unaligned_xx to > turn into something suitable depending on the arch. Any objections? I'm not sure what you're talking about here, or what change you're proposing. Without any kind of frame of reference, I can't comment. Sorry. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
