Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking: qspinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:17:46PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Except that I do a single atomic short integer write to switch the bits
> instead of 2 byte write.

D'0h why didn't I think of that. A single short write is much better
than the 2 byte writes.

In any case; can you try and keep the structure in this patch-set if you
post another version? It takes a lot of effort to unravel your
all-in-one patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux