On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 06:48:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Linus Torvalds > <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > And conversely, the C11 people can walk away from us too. But if they > > can't make us happy (and by "make us happy", I really mean no stupid > > games on our part) I personally think they'll have a stronger > > standard, and a real use case, and real arguments. I'm assuming they > > want that. > > I should have somebody who proof-reads my emails before I send them out. > > I obviously meant "if they *can* make us happy" (not "can't"). Understood. My next step is to take a more detailed look at the piece of the standard that should support RCU. Depending on how that turns out, I might look at other parts of the standard vs. Linux's atomics and memory-ordering needs. Should be interesting. ;-) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
