Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:

> I think that if we have different options, there needs to be agreement
> on which to choose across the compilers, at the very least.  I don't
> quite know how this looks like for GCC and LLVM, for example.

I'm not sure we even necessarily get compatibility for the alignment of 
_Atomic types yet (and no ABI document I've seen discusses that issue).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux