On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:25:49PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > > Is it worth considering a move towards using C11 atomics and barriers and > compiler intrinsics inside the kernel? The compiler _ought_ to be able to do > these. Makes sense to me! > One thing I'm not sure of, though, is how well gcc's atomics will cope with > interrupt handlers touching atomics on CPUs without suitable atomic > instructions - that said, userspace does have to deal with signals getting > underfoot. but then userspace can't normally disable interrupts. Perhaps make the C11 definitions so that any arch can override any specific definition? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
