Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 02:24:33PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> Light contention is the only case where the qspinlock may not perform as
> good as the ticket spinlock. I know this is the most common case. However, I
> would argue that the slowdown, if any, will not be really noticeable. This
> is what I will try to find out.

Please also explain why things are slower/faster. Thomas tried to get
you to do so a few months back, but you kept deflecting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux