Re: [PATCH] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 09:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > There are 7 architecures with "config SECCOMP".  They all have
> > virtually the same help text except for those referencing the
> > /proc interface.  The /proc interface was removed in 2007.
> > 
> > There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
> > that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
> > other syscall.  It is absurd to have the option in the
> > arch-specific menus.
> > 
> > Move it to the security menu, consolidate the 7 down to one, and
> > remove the embarassingly-ancient help text references and
> > dependencies on /proc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

For powerpc:

Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux