On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:22:22PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Despite the name mach-crag6410-module.c, the code is built for > MACH_WLF_CRAGG_6410 -- which is bool, and hence this code is > either present or absent. It will never be modular, so using > module_init as an alias for __initcall can be somewhat > misleading. > > Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from > init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd > have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that > would be a worse thing. > > Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one > of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets > mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall > directly in this change means that the runtime impact is > zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering. > > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Tested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
