Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v5 12/18] ftrace/kprobes: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro in ftrace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2013/12/10 2:04), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:47:46 +0000
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
>> @@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ struct probe_arg {
>>  	const struct fetch_type	*type;	/* Type of this argument */
>>  };
>>  
>> -static inline __kprobes void call_fetch(struct fetch_param *fprm,
>> -				 struct pt_regs *regs, void *dest)
>> +static inline void call_fetch(struct fetch_param *fprm,
>> +			      struct pt_regs *regs, void *dest)
>>  {
>>  	return fprm->fn(regs, fprm->data, dest);
>>  }
>>
> 
> Is this OK to be probed? I've had cases where a header "static inline"
> was not always inlined. Unless you have "__always_inline" this is not
> guaranteed to be inlined.

Ah, right! I need to change it to __always_inline to prevent
probing on it.

> 
> As for the rest of the patch:
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you! :)


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux