Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] qrwlock: Enable fair queue read/write lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> FWIW unfair can be faster in some cases. It depends on the workload.

Sure. And we've never cared before.

When we switched over to the ticket spinlocks, we actually had
*numbers* about how the old unfair spinlocks could be faster. And we
still didn't leave a "unfair spinlocks" option. Because it didn't make
sense.

Why would it make sense here?

                Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux