Re: [RFC PATCH REBASED 2/3] x86: Move fpu_counter into ARCH specific thread_struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ingo,

On 09/23/2013 02:03 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Only a couple of arches (sh/x86) use fpu_counter in task_struct so it
>> can be moved out into ARCH specific thread_struct, reducing the size of
>> task_struct for other arches.
>>
>> Compile tested i386_defconfig + gcc 4.7.3
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h | 10 +++++-----
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h    |  9 +++++++++
>>  arch/x86/kernel/i387.c              |  2 +-
>>  arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c        |  4 ++--
>>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c        |  2 +-
>>  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c             |  2 +-
>>  6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

We are still at girdlock here because linux-sh mailing list seems be /dev/null,
while email to Paul Mundt kept bouncing.

I tried to contact someone in SuperH community, via the superH Linux portal - and
got this.

-------------->8--------------
Vineet

Unfortunately Paul Mundt is no longer work for Renesas and SuperH Linux.
Maybe he intentionally shutdown his e-mail server. So this is not a simple
server problem.  Very sorry for your inconvenience.
-------------->8--------------

So do you think it would appropriate to take this patch series anyways. For last
several months none of the cross-arch sweeping patches have had any ACK's from
them plus this is a straight forward mechanical change.

-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux