* Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The blind __this_cpu conversions without proper preempt debugging > > cannot continue without first fixing all the fallout of the missing > > debug checks to begin with. > > That will take some time as the feedback from the other patchset > suggests. That's the reason why we insisted on __this_cpu*() primitives growing these essential debug checks early on - which you resisted. I had to bring out NAKs for you to see sense and start fixing the mess already - next time around I'll probably have to NAK your changes earlier to prevent such mishaps. ( Note that some false positives were possibly fixed by the use of the lib/smp_processor_id.c methods to check for preemptability, so the situation might not be as dire as your first series suggests. ) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
