On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 15:04 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 9/12/2013 2:53 PM, Mark Salter wrote: > > Remove messy dependencies from PARPORT_PC by having it depend on one > > Kconfig symbol (ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT) and having architectures > > which need it declare ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT in arch/*/Kconfig. > > New architectures are unlikely to need PARPORT_PC, so this avoids > > having an ever growing list of architectures to exclude. Those > > architectures which do declare ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT in this > > patch are the ones which have an asm/parport.h. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > You can actually omit the arch/tile change, since as far as I know there's no way for tile to have PARPORT_PC. > Yeah, I thought that the list of architectures in the patch would end up being a superset of what was really needed. Especially for those which used the generic parport.h. I can drop tile from this patch but you may want to get rid of the parport.h from arch/tile/include/asm/Kbuild. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
