Re: [PATCH 6/7] sched, x86: Provide a per-cpu preempt_count implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 15:08 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> +static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
> +{
> +	return __this_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
> +}

Not sure why you used the _4 prefix on all accessors ?

>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
> +	/*
> +	 * If it were not for PREEMPT_ACTIVE we could guarantee that the
> +	 * preempt_count of all tasks was equal here and this would not be
> +	 * needed.
> +	 */
> +	task_thread_info(prev_p)->saved_preempt_count = __raw_get_cpu_var(__preempt_count);

	this_cpu_read(__preempt_count) ?

> +	__raw_get_cpu_var(__preempt_count) = task_thread_info(next_p)->saved_preempt_count;

	this_cpu_write(__preempt_count,
                       task_thread_info(next_p)->saved_preempt_count;

> +#endif
> +
>  	this_cpu_write(kernel_stack,
>  		  (unsigned long)task_stack_page(next_p) +
>  		  THREAD_SIZE - KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET);
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux