On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > Seriously first fix the debug and validation bits of the *this_cpu* > > stuff. > > Note that most of the other 'gcv' patches have these problems as well, so > it's a NAK from me as well for most of the other patches as well ... Note that this only affects __this_cpu_read and __this_cpu_write not the this_cpu_ptr() operation. The objection against having other variants of this_cpu operations before was that there were too many. If we want to reintroduce the preemption checks in the __ operations then we would need another variant for those places that do not need it. Right now we only have the regular ops which are interrupt safe and the unsafe variant that can be used anyplace. We could add a ____this_cpu variant that would be used in the cases we do not want preemption checks? There should not be too many but it will mean a whole lot of new definitions in percpu.h. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
