Re: [RFC] Get rid of SUBARCH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If ARCH doesn't match uname for some definition of match?

Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>> The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
>> These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH !=
>SUBARCH.
>> Do really need that behavior?
>
>Not precisely that, but it’s very common in m68k land
>to just cross-build kernels with
>
>$ make ARCH=m68k menuconfig
>$ make ARCH=m68k
>
>Maybe a generalising of that feature, and making it
>independent of SUBARCH (which can then die)?
>
>bye,
>//mirabilos

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux