On 08/14/2013 08:39 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > ..so could the rq = cpu_rq(cpu) sequence be improved cycle expenditure > wise by squirreling rq pointer away in a percpu this_rq, and replacing > cpu_rq(cpu) above with a __this_cpu_read(this_rq) version of this_rq()? > Yes. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html