Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:24:21 +0530
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Spelvin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>, "Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@xxxxxx>, "Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20130801204710.GH27162@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
List-id: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
Organization: IBM
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 08/02/2013 02:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:53:22AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:

You need to learn to trim your replies.. I already stopped reading that
paravirt thread because of it. Soon I'll introduce you to my /dev/null
mail reader.


will be more careful next time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH RFC 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
  - From: Waiman Long
- Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
  - From: Raghavendra K T
- Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
  - From: Peter Zijlstra

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2/6] arch: mm: do not invoke OOM killer on kernel fault OOM
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Newbies] [x86 Platform Driver] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux Filesystems] [Yosemite Discussion] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]