Re: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/26/2013 06:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win 
>>> a K or two.)
>>>
>>
>> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your
>> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ?
> 
> I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny 
> additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are 
> crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a 
> measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree 
> patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support.
> 

Thank you for your reply in details.


Thanks
-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux