On 06/26/2013 05:48 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> >> Since the API itself already contents the meaning: "return NULL means >>> >> the arch has no related io memory", > No, NULL means it could not map the I/O memory. > "it could not map the I/O memory" includes "has no related io memory". So it is enough for our case. >>> >> Why not define a generic dummy one in "include/asm-generic/io.h" instead >>> >> of "HAS_IOMEM" (which has already spread many various places, and also, >>> >> most of new drivers have to know about it). >>> >> >>> >> e.g: in "include/asm-generic/io.h", if "CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM=n", define a >>> >> dummy ioremap() which return NULL ... (also need consider more details). >> > >> > Because we don't even want to build these drivers and not make them fail while >> > executing io memory related functions. > Indeed, it doesn't make sense to build drivers that cannot work. > And they may fail in a very bad way. That is our 'platform' guys feeling, not the 'module' guys, as 'platform' guys, it is better to provide the choice to 'module' guys, and let them decide by themselves, not forced by us. Thanks. -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
