[PATCH v5 7/7] locking-selftests: handle unexpected failures more strictly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not enabled, more tests are expected to
pass unexpectedly, but there no tests that should start to fail that
pass with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 lib/locking-selftest.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
index d554f3f..aad024d 100644
--- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
+++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
@@ -976,16 +976,18 @@ static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected, int lockclass_mask)
 	/*
 	 * Filter out expected failures:
 	 */
-	if (debug_locks != expected) {
 #ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
+	if (expected == FAILURE && debug_locks) {
 		expected_testcase_failures++;
 		printk("failed|");
-#else
+	}
+	else
+#endif
+	if (debug_locks != expected) {
 		unexpected_testcase_failures++;
 		printk("FAILED|");
 
 		dump_stack();
-#endif
 	} else {
 		testcase_successes++;
 		printk("  ok  |");

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux