On 06/08/2013 03:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 06/07/2013 11:30 PM, Chen Gang wrote: >> > >> > atomic_set_mask() has already have 'unsigned' type case, and >> > atomic_clear_mask() is the pair of atomic_set_mask(). >> > >> > So it also need 'unsigned' type case. >> > > Pray tell, in what situation does this matter? The only reason I can > think of is if "mask" is actually a long... Excuse me, in fact, I don't know whether it will cause issue. Since atomic_set_mask() has done, I think atomic_clear_mask() also need it. If atomic_clear_mask() do need it, the atomic_set_mask() do not need it either, they are the pairs --> they will face the same situation. Thanks. -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
